5 Million Farmers Sue Monsanto for $7.7 Billion

Share on Google+Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on Pinterest

5 Million Farmers Sue Monsanto

by Natural Society

Launching a lawsuit against the very company that is responsible for a farmer suicide every 30 minutes, 5 million farmers are now suing Monsanto for as much as 6.2 billion euros (around 7.7 billion US dollars). The reason? As with many other cases, such as the ones that led certain farming regions to be known as the ‘suicide belt’, Monsanto has been reportedly taxing the farmers to financial shambles with ridiculous royalty charges. The farmers state that Monsanto has been unfairly gathering exorbitant profits each year on a global scale from “renewal” seed harvests, which are crops planted using seed from the previous year’s harvest.

The practice of using renewal seeds dates back to ancient times, but Monsanto seeks to collect massive royalties and put an end to the practice. Why? Because Monsanto owns the very patent to the genetically modified seed, and is charging the farmers not only for the original crops, but the later harvests as well. Eventually, the royalties compound and many farmers begin to struggle with even keeping their farm afloat. It is for this reason that India slammed Monsanto with groundbreaking ‘biopiracy’ charges in an effort to stop Monsanto from ‘patenting life’.

Jane Berwanger, a lawyer for the farmers who went on record regarding the case, told the Associted Press:

“Monsanto gets paid when it sell the seeds. The law gives producers the right to multiply the seeds they buy and nowhere in the world is there a requirement to pay (again). Producers are in effect paying a private tax on production.”

The findings echo what thousands of farmers have experienced in particularly poor nations, where many of the farmers are unable to stand up to Monsanto. Back in 2008, the Daily Mail covered what is known as the ‘GM Genocide’, which is responsible for taking the lives of over 17,683 Indian farmers in 2009 alone. After finding that their harvests were failing and they started to enter economic turmoil, the farmers began ending their own lives — oftentimes drinking the very same insecticide that Monsanto provided them with.

As the information continues to surface on Monsanto’s crimes, further lawsuits will begin to take effect. After it was ousted in January that Monsanto was running illegal ‘slave-like’ working rings, more individuals became aware of just how seriously Monsanto seems to disregard their workers — so why would they care for the health of their consumers? In April, another group of farmers sued Monsanto for ‘knowingly poisoning’ workers and causing ‘devastating birth defects’.

Will endless lawsuits from millions of seriously affected individuals be the end of Monsanto?

GrowTest Reading Selection

 Check out the How to Resources page here

Share on Google+Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on Pinterest

Categorised in: , ,


  • citizen says:

    thats a bullsh**t law , how would the rich like it if that was the stuff they were consuming how could they do that to people…..

  • Concerned person says:

    If someone took someone else’s logo for their business and changed it they would not be able to sue someone else for modifying the logo they stole from somone else. Monsanto modified a seed that did not belong to them to begin with. If anything the people of the world should be suing them for a portion of their profits for sealing our seed we originally planted and grew over the years. When someone took apples logo and altered the bite in it to have a shadow of Steve jobs face and tried to say that was theirs now, apple could actualy them. Legally people are looking at how to take down Monsanto all wrong. Monsanto did not create the seed from the ground up. They stole seeds that belong to world food supply and modified something that was not theirs to begin with.

    • Prudent Shopper says:

      That’s a dumb analogy…By that logic, any trademark created by using a pencil would belong to everyone since the carbon in the pencil wasn’t created by the trademark creator. Monsanto has ownership of the product they create. If that product reproduces itself however, that offspring belongs to Monsanto if, and only if, Monsanto sold the original modified seed with the condition that any future seeds remain the property of Monsanto. The farmers are aware of the conditions of the sale before purchase and understood that they would be required to pay royalty for future crops. They were not forced to buy Monsanto products, they chose to purchase them and accepted all the conditions of the sale. I’m not advocating for Monsanto and I think their modified seeds are producing dangerous produce. I won’t eat their GMOs and I would like to see a ban on their use in the US.

  • Care says:

    Why don’t the farmers buy organic seeds elsewhere?

    • Ivan says:

      They are under contract

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>